com.pakistancaselaw/caselaw

Est-ce que com.pakistancaselaw/caselaw est sûr ?

Au dernier audit MCP Hub, le serveur MCP « com.pakistancaselaw/caselaw » est classé « Non encore testé ». Référencé dans l'annuaire. Seul le pentest comportemental fait foi, et il n'a pas encore été exécuté sur ce serveur. Le verdict est réévalué en continu ; consultez la fiche pour l'état à jour.

Méthode : MCP Hub analyse la description de chaque outil (couche 1) et, pour le verdict fort, exécute le serveur dans une micro-VM isolée avec leurres et réseau bloqué (couche 2). On publie des noms et des compteurs, jamais le contenu brut renvoyé par un outil.

Les 7 outils

• caselaw_get_case≈ 322 tokens

  Fetch one judgment by id. section='summary' (default) returns metadata + the headnote (plain-language summary, the laws/provisions referred, and keyword tags) — read this first to judge relevance cheaply. section='full' additionally returns the judgment body text (capped at ~40,000 chars; the response flags body_truncated/body_chars_total when longer).

  Paramètres, retour & exemple (3)

  Paramètres

  • case_id · integer · requis
    Numeric judgment id (from a search/lookup/graph result)
  • section · string · optionnel · summary | full
    'summary' = metadata + headnote (cheap); 'full' = + judgment text
  • response_format · string · optionnel · markdown | json

  Exemple d'appel

  {"name": "caselaw_get_case", "arguments": {"case_id": 1}}

  Exemple de retour

  {"content": [{"type": "text", "text": "…"}], "structuredContent": {"result": "texte"}}

• caselaw_get_citations≈ 329 tokens

  Walk the citation graph FORWARD: list the in-corpus cases that THIS judgment cites (the precedents it relied on). Combine with caselaw_get_cited_by to traverse precedent backward and forward until a research question is resolved. Most useful on RECENT judgments: a 2024-25 case usually has nobody citing it yet, but its own citation list is a curated map of the established authority on the point.

  Paramètres, retour & exemple (4)

  Paramètres

  • limit · integer · optionnel
  • offset · integer · optionnel
  • case_id · integer · requis
    Numeric judgment id
  • response_format · string · optionnel · markdown | json

  Exemple d'appel

  {"name": "caselaw_get_citations", "arguments": {"case_id": 1}}

  Exemple de retour

  {"content": [{"type": "text", "text": "…"}], "structuredContent": {"result": "texte"}}

• caselaw_get_cited_by≈ 316 tokens

  Walk the citation graph BACKWARD: list later cases that cite THIS judgment (how it was subsequently treated — followed, distinguished, relied upon). Returns newest first. Most useful on OLDER or landmark judgments: it shows whether the case is still followed and where the principle has been applied since. A leading case can have hundreds of citing cases.

  Paramètres, retour & exemple (4)

  Paramètres

  • limit · integer · optionnel
  • offset · integer · optionnel
  • case_id · integer · requis
    Numeric judgment id
  • response_format · string · optionnel · markdown | json

  Exemple d'appel

  {"name": "caselaw_get_cited_by", "arguments": {"case_id": 1}}

  Exemple de retour

  {"content": [{"type": "text", "text": "…"}], "structuredContent": {"result": "texte"}}

• caselaw_lookup_citation≈ 395 tokens

  Find the judgment(s) at an exact law-report citation. Example: journal='PLD', year=1995, page=34 → PLD 1995 Supreme Court 34. Omit page to list everything reported in that journal+year. Returns the same case shape as caselaw_search.

  Paramètres, retour & exemple (6)

  Paramètres

  • page · ? · optionnel
    Page/serial number in the report (optional)
  • year · ? · optionnel
    Year of the report, e.g. 1995
  • limit · integer · optionnel
  • offset · integer · optionnel
  • journal · string · requis
    Law-report code, e.g. 'PLD', 'SCMR', 'CLC' (a whole citation such as 'PLD 1995 SC 34' is also understood)
  • response_format · string · optionnel · markdown | json

  Exemple d'appel

  {"name": "caselaw_lookup_citation", "arguments": {"journal": "texte"}}

  Exemple de retour

  {"content": [{"type": "text", "text": "…"}], "structuredContent": {"result": "texte"}}

• caselaw_most_cited≈ 229 tokens

  List the most-cited (landmark) judgments in the corpus, ranked by how many other cases cite them. A good entry point for the leading authorities on Pakistani law.

  Paramètres, retour & exemple (3)

  Paramètres

  • limit · integer · optionnel
  • offset · integer · optionnel
  • response_format · string · optionnel · markdown | json

  Exemple d'appel

  {"name": "caselaw_most_cited", "arguments": {"limit": 1, "offset": 1, "response_format": "markdown"}}

  Exemple de retour

  {"content": [{"type": "text", "text": "…"}], "structuredContent": {"result": "texte"}}

• caselaw_search≈ 1014 tokens

  Full-text search of Pakistani judgments (Supreme Court, High Courts, Federal Shariat Court and tribunals, 1970 onward), with optional filters by court, judge, author, law report and year. Ranking follows how lawyers research: nearness to the legal point decides which cases are returned; among comparably-near cases, more senior court > larger bench > more recent > more cited. For the current state of the law, add year_from (e.g. 2025); use sort='court' for the most authoritative first. With no query, the filters list judgments newest first - e.g. court='Supreme Court' gives the latest Supreme Court judgments, journal='PLD' with year_from=year_to=2024 gives that volume, and sort='recently_added' alone shows what was added to the site most recently. Returns cases with id, title, citation, court, year, outcome, author (the judge who wrote it, when known) and the public URL. For an exact report citation use caselaw_lookup_citation. To read a case, pass its id to caselaw_get_case.

  Paramètres, retour & exemple (11)

  Paramètres

  • sort · string · optionnel
    relevance (default: nearest on the point, then court/bench/recency/citations) | newest (the ~200 closest matches in strict date order) | court (most senior court first) | recently_added (newest additions to the site). For the CURRENT law on a point, keep relevance and set year_from (e.g. 2025): strict date order can surface judgments that only mention the point in passing.
  • court · ? · optionnel
    Only this court: 'Supreme Court', 'Lahore High Court' (or 'LHC'), 'Sindh High Court', 'Peshawar High Court', 'Islamabad High Court', 'Balochistan High Court', 'Federal Shariat Court', or a tribunal's name
  • judge · ? · optionnel
    Only judgments where this judge sat on the bench. Spelling-tolerant: 'Asif Khosa', 'Qazi Faez Isa'. The reply names the judge it matched.
  • limit · integer · optionnel
  • query · ? · optionnel
    Keywords, e.g. 'bail murder 302' or 'khula dower'. May be left out when a filter is given.
  • author · ? · optionnel
    Only judgments this judge WROTE (the author of the judgment, who also sat on its bench) - narrower than `judge`, which includes every case the judge sat on. Spelling-tolerant like `judge`.
  • offset · integer · optionnel
  • journal · ? · optionnel
    Only judgments reported in this law report: 'PLD', 'SCMR', 'CLC', 'YLR', 'PLC(CS)', 'PTD' ... With year_from/year_to it selects that volume, e.g. SCMR 2025.
  • year_to · ? · optionnel
    Latest year (inclusive)
  • year_from · ? · optionnel
    Earliest year (inclusive)
  • response_format · string · optionnel · markdown | json

  Exemple d'appel

  {"name": "caselaw_search", "arguments": {"sort": "texte", "court": "texte", "judge": "texte", "limit": 1, "query": "texte", "author": "texte"}}

  Exemple de retour

  {"content": [{"type": "text", "text": "…"}], "structuredContent": {"result": "texte"}}

• caselaw_search_questions≈ 693 tokens

  Find judgments by the QUESTION they settle, rather than by words they contain. Every judgment summary on this corpus records the questions that judgment actually decides — e.g. "Does delay in lodging the FIR by itself entitle the accused to bail?" This searches those questions, so it matches the shape a legal problem arrives in rather than the vocabulary a 1987 bench happened to use. COVERAGE IS PARTIAL: only some judgments have a summary with questions yet (the response's `coverage_note` gives the current live ratio, which keeps growing). An empty result means no *summarised* judgment matched — it does NOT mean no such judgment exists. Fall back to caselaw_search, which covers the whole corpus. The questions are prepared from the judgment text. They are a finding aid, not a holding: cite the judgment, never the question. Pass an id to caselaw_get_case to read it.

  Paramètres, retour & exemple (8)

  Paramètres

  • court · ? · optionnel
    Only this court, e.g. 'Supreme Court' or 'Lahore High Court'
  • judge · ? · optionnel
    Only judgments where this judge sat on the bench (spelling-tolerant, e.g. 'Mansoor Ali Shah')
  • limit · integer · optionnel
  • query · string · requis
    The legal question or its subject, in the words a judgment would use — 'delay in lodging FIR', 'concurrent findings of fact', 'pre-arrest bail murder'
  • offset · integer · optionnel
  • year_to · ? · optionnel
    Latest year (inclusive)
  • year_from · ? · optionnel
    Earliest year (inclusive)
  • response_format · string · optionnel · markdown | json

  Exemple d'appel

  {"name": "caselaw_search_questions", "arguments": {"query": "texte"}}

  Exemple de retour

  {"content": [{"type": "text", "text": "…"}], "structuredContent": {"result": "texte"}}

C'est votre serveur ?

Revendiquez-le sur l'espace créateur (preuve GitHub, domaine ou npm) pour afficher le badge « propriétaire vérifié » et lancer un pentest comportemental à la demande afin d'obtenir le badge « Vérifié ».

Créer un compte / revendiquer →

Source

https://pakistancaselaw.com/mcp